ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Binding, N
Right arrow Articles by Witting, U
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Binding, N
Right arrow Articles by Witting, U
Eur Respir J 2000; 16: 499-503
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Original Articles

NO chemiluminescence in exhaled air: interference of compounds from endogenous or exogenous sources

N Binding, W Muller, PA Czeschinski, and U Witting

Nitric oxide determination in exhaled air using chemiluminescence analysers is increasingly used, but may be affected by various other components of the air sample. The influence of several compounds originating from endogenous or exogenous sources on NO readings has been studied. Defined amounts of water vapour, carbon dioxide, acetone, heptane, acetonitrile, oxygen, nitrous oxide and enflurane were added to air samples with NO concentrations 0-250 parts per billion. Marked and significant decreases in NO readings, which strongly depend on the concentration of the respective interfering compound, were found for water vapour (0.155% per 1% relative humidity), carbon dioxide (1.97% per 1% CO2 volume/volume (v/v)) and nitrous oxide (0.608% per 1% v/v N2O). While acetone in concentrations up to 8.5% v/v had no measurable effect on NO readings, heptane and acetonitrile led to marked decreases. Oxygen in concentrations of up to 95% (v/v) had no effect on NO determination. NO readings were markedly decreased by >10% per 1% (v/v) of the anaesthetic enflurane. However, due to large variations in NO values, these decreases were not statistically significant. Furthermore, enflurane reacted with the molybdenum converter of the NO(x) analyser in use, resulting in major damage to the instrument. Eliminating, or at least considering, interferences by compounds present in exhaled air is an urgent prerequisite for reliable and precise nitric oxide determination.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. A. KHARITONOV and P. J. BARNES
Exhaled Markers of Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2001; 163(7): 1693 - 1722.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.