ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salome, C.
Right arrow Articles by Woolcock, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salome, C.
Right arrow Articles by Woolcock, A.
Eur Respir J 2000; 16: 38-43
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Clinical Trial

The effect of insecticide aerosols on lung function, airway responsiveness and symptoms in asthmatic subjects

CM Salome, GB Marks, P Savides, W Xuan, and AJ Woolcock

The object of this study was to compare the effect of standard and "low irritant" insecticide aerosols on lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and symptoms in asthmatic subjects. A double blind randomized, crossover study was conducted in 25 asthmatic subjects who reported sensitivity to insecticide aerosols. All subjects were exposed for 30 min, on separate occasions, to two standard insecticide formulations (A and B), one low irritant formulation (C) and a negative control aerosol. Spirometric function and chest, nose and eye symptoms were recorded during, and for 90 min after, the exposure. AHR to methacholine was measured 90 min after the exposure. Compared to the negative control, the maximum fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was slightly greater after standard insecticides (mean differences from control +/-95% confidence interval: aerosol A, 3.3+/-3.6%, p=0.08; aerosol B, 5.1+/-4.7%, p=0.04), AHR was significantly more severe (mean difference from control: aerosol A, 0.35+/-0.29 doubling doses, p=0.028; aerosol B, 0.52+/-0.43 doubling doses, p=0.028), and symptoms were more severe. The low irritant test aerosol (C) did not differ significantly from the negative control with respect to FEV1, AHR or symptoms. It is concluded that some insecticide aerosols trigger symptoms and falls in lung function in some people with asthma. Furthermore, these aerosols may also increase airway hyperresponsiveness, although the mechanism of this effect has not been determined. The low irritant formulation did not appear to have the same effects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CMAJHome page
R. Dales MD MSc(Epi, L. Liu MMD PhD, A. J. Wheeler PhD, and N. L. Gilbert MSc
Quality of indoor residential air and health
Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 15, 2008; 179(2): 147 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
L-X. Zhang, D.A. Enarson, G-X. He, B. Li, and M. Chan-Yeung
Occupational and environmental risk factors for respiratory symptoms in rural Beijing, China
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2002; 20(6): 1525 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.