ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rytila, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laitinen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rytila, P.
Right arrow Articles by Laitinen, L.
Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 1116-1119
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Clinical Trial

Safety of sputum induction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

PH Rytila, AE Lindqvist, and LA Laitinen

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety of sputum induction in patients with varying severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The subjects were 28 smokers with baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of (mean and range) 1.8 (0.8-2.9) L that is 53 (28-69)% of the predicted and reversibility of 2.5 (-7.4-9.9)%. Sputum was induced after premedication with 200 microg salbutamol at increasing concentrations (0.9, 3, 4, and 5%) of hypertonic saline nebulized by an ultrasonic nebulizer. The procedure was well tolerated, and none of the patients reported major side-effects. However, the mean change from prebronchodilator FEV1 during induction was -8.5 (-23-11)%, p=0.001, and from postbronchodilator FEV1 -10.7 (-25-5)%, p<0.0001. Three (11%) of the patients had a fall in FEV1 from the prebronchodilator baseline of >20%, and a further 10 (36%) had a fall of 10-20%. Patients with greater reversibility in airway obstruction seemed to get the best benefit from the bronchodilator pretreatment, since there was an inverse relationship between reversibility in FEV1 and fall in FEV1 during induction (r=-0.4, p=0.03). It is concluded that sputum induction by hypertonic saline inhalation can cause meaningful bronchoconstriction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, despite pretreatment with an inhaled beta2-agonist. The results highlight the importance of monitoring spirometry during sputum induction to detect bronchoconstriction.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
M. Cazzola, W. MacNee, F. J. Martinez, K. F. Rabe, L. G. Franciosi, P. J. Barnes, V. Brusasco, P. S. Burge, P. M. A. Calverley, B. R. Celli, et al.
Outcomes for COPD pharmacological trials: from lung function to biomarkers
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2008; 31(2): 416 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Bathoorn, J. Liesker, D. Postma, G. Koeter, A. J. M. van Oosterhout, and H. A. M. Kerstjens
Safety of Sputum Induction During Exacerbations of COPD
Chest, February 1, 2007; 131(2): 432 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P Boschetto, S Quintavalle, E Zeni, S Leprotti, A Potena, L Ballerin, A Papi, G Palladini, M Luisetti, L Annovazzi, et al.
Association between markers of emphysema and more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Thorax, December 1, 2006; 61(12): 1037 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. J. Barnes, B. Chowdhury, S. A. Kharitonov, H. Magnussen, C. P. Page, D. Postma, and M. Saetta
Pulmonary Biomarkers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2006; 174(1): 6 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
I.E. Zuhlke, F. Kanniess, K. Richter, D. Nielsen-Gode, S. Bohme, R.A. Jorres, and H. Magnussen
Montelukast attenuates the airway response to hypertonic saline in moderate-to-severe COPD
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2003; 22(6): 926 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R.O. Crapo, R.L. Jensen, and F.E. Hargreave
Airway inflammation in COPD: physiological outcome measures and induced sputum
Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2003; 21(41_suppl): 19S - 28s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P. Boschetto, M. Miniati, D. Miotto, F. Braccioni, E. De Rosa, I. Bononi, A. Papi, M. Saetta, L.M. Fabbri, and C.E. Mapp
Predominant emphysema phenotype in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2003; 21(3): 450 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. G. Kelly, V. Brown, S. L. Martin, M. Ennis, and J. S. Elborn
Comparison of Sputum Induction Using High-Output and Low-Output Ultrasonic Nebulizers in Normal Subjects and Patients With COPD*
Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 955 - 959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. TAUBE, O. HOLZ, M. MUCKE, R. A. JORRES, and H. MAGNUSSEN
Airway Response to Inhaled Hypertonic Saline in Patients with Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2001; 164(10): 1810 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
P MAESTRELLI, L RICHELDI, M MORETTI, and L M FABBRI
Analysis of sputum in COPD
Thorax, June 1, 2001; 56(6): 420 - 422.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J.A. Kastelik, I. Aziz, and A.H. Morice
Sputum induction in young cystic fibrosis patients
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2001; 17(4): 832 - 832.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.