ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cormier, Y
Right arrow Articles by Duchaine, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cormier, Y
Right arrow Articles by Duchaine, C
Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 560-565
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Original Articles

Farming practices and the respiratory health risks of swine confinement buildings

Y Cormier, E Israel-Assayag, G Racine, and C Duchaine

This study investigated whether clean swine confinement buildings (SCB) are less harmful to the respiratory system than older and dirtier facilities. Eight healthy volunteers were exposed for 4 h, at 1 week intervals, to eight SCB representing the widest possible range of cleanliness. Each volunteer and a technician rated the SCB for cleanliness from 1-10, 1 being the cleanest possible. Airborne dust, bacteria, endotoxin levels, molds, and ammonia were measured. For each volunteer measured, before and after each exposure, forced expiratory flows (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and forced vital capacity), white cells in nasal wash and venous blood, and nasal lavage levels of interleukin (IL)-8 and serum levels of IL-6. A methacholine challenge was obtained at baseline and following each exposure. Cleanliness scores ranged 1.5-8.25. Mean airborne levels were: dust 3.54 mg x m(-3) bacteria 4.25 x 10(5) CFU x m(-3); endotoxins 404 EU x m(-3); molds 883 CFU x m(-3); ammonia 20.7 parts per million (ppm). Expiratory flows decreased after exposure (FEV1 from 4.8+/-0.7 to 4.4+/-0.7, p<0.001), neutrophils in the nasal wash and white blood cells increased (28.5+/-37 to 424+/-207 x 10(3), 5.4+/-1.0 to 7.4+/-1.7 x 10(9) cells x mL(-1) respectively), IL-8 increased from 158+/-311 to 2679+/-639 pg x mL(-1), IL-6 from 0.15+/-0.26 to 2.34+/-0.92 pg x mL(-1), (p<0.001). All SCB were similarly harmful. In conclusion, modern farming has not succeeded in making swine confinement buildings inoffensive to exposed subjects.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Senthilselvan, L. Chenard, K. Ulmer, N. Gibson-Burlinguette, C. Leuschen, and J. A. Dosman
Excess Respiratory Symptoms in Full-time Male and Female Workers in Large-Scale Swine Operations
Chest, April 1, 2007; 131(4): 1197 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. Chenard, A. Senthilselvan, V. K. Grover, S. P. Kirychuk, J. A. Lawson, T. S. Hurst, and J. A. Dosman
Lung Function and Farm Size Predict Healthy Worker Effect in Swine Farmers
Chest, January 1, 2007; 131(1): 245 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J.A. Dosman, J.A. Lawson, S.P. Kirychuk, Y. Cormier, J. Biem, and N. Koehncke
Occupational asthma in newly employed workers in intensive swine confinement facilities
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2004; 24(4): 698 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.