Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 517-525
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000
Comparison of effects of supervised versus self-monitored training programmes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
L Puente-Maestu,
ML Sanz,
P Sanz,
JM Cubillo,
J Mayol,
and
R Casaburi
The effects of two 8 week programmes of reconditioning in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients were studied. Forty one subjects (mean+/-SD) 644.5) yrs; forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.09+/-0.16 L; 40.6+/-6.2% predicted were randomly assigned either to supervised training on a treadmill, 4 days x week(-1) (group S; n=21) or walking 3 or 4 km in 1 h 4 days x week(-1), self-monitored with a pedometer, with weekly visits to encourage adherence (group SM; n=20). Patients were evaluated with the chronic respiratory diseases questionnaire (CRQ) and two exercise tests on a treadmill: incremental (IT) and constant (CT), above lactic threshold or 70% of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2, max) with arterial blood lactate determinations. Estimated mean work rate of training was 69+/-27 W and 25+/-5 W respectively for groups S and SM. Both types of training produced similar changes in the four dimensions of the CRQ. In group S reconditioning yielded significant (p<0.05) increases in VO2, max and increases in duration, with decreased lactate accumulation, ventilation, CO2 output (VCO2), heart rate (HR) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at the end of CT. They also adopted a deeper slower pattern of breathing during exercise. The SM group showed significant (p<0.05) increases in duration, lower HR and DBP at the end of CT. Significantly (p<0.05) different effects between S and SM programmes were changes in VO2, max 100+/-101 mL x min(-1) versus 5+/-101 mL x min(-1)), duration of the CT (8.1+/-4.4 min versus 3.9+/-4.7 min), VCO2 (-94+/-153 mL x min(-1) versus 48+/-252 mL x min(-1)), lactate accumulation (-1.3+/-2.2 mmol x L(-1) versus 0+/-1.2 mmol x L(-1) and respiratory rate at the end of CT (4.3+/-3.4 min(-1) versus -1+/-4.2 min(-1)). Supervised, intense training yields physiological improvements in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients not induced by self-monitored training. The self-monitored, less intense training, increases submaximal exercise endurance, although to a lesser degree.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Puente-Maestu, F. Villar, J. de Miguel, W. W. Stringer, P. Sanz, M. L. Sanz, J. Garcia de Pedro, and Y. Martinez-Abad
Clinical relevance of constant power exercise duration changes in COPD
Eur. Respir. J.,
August 1, 2009;
34(2):
340 - 345.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Langer, E. Hendriks, C. Burtin, V. Probst, C. van der Schans, W. Paterson, M. Verhoef-de Wijk, R. Straver, M. Klaassen, T. Troosters, et al.
A clinical practice guideline for physiotherapists treating patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on a systematic review of available evidence
Clinical Rehabilitation,
May 1, 2009;
23(5):
445 - 462.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Maltais, J. Bourbeau, S. Shapiro, Y. Lacasse, H. Perrault, M. Baltzan, P. Hernandez, M. Rouleau, M. Julien, S. Parenteau, et al.
Effects of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Trial
Ann Intern Med,
December 16, 2008;
149(12):
869 - 878.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S Skumlien, E A Skogedal, O Bjortuft, and M S Ryg
Four weeks' intensive rehabilitation generates significant health effects in COPD patients
Chronic Respiratory Disease,
February 1, 2007;
4(1):
5 - 13.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Nici, C. Donner, E. Wouters, R. Zuwallack, N. Ambrosino, J. Bourbeau, M. Carone, B. Celli, M. Engelen, B. Fahy, et al.
American thoracic society/european respiratory society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
June 15, 2006;
173(12):
1390 - 1413.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R ZuWallack, A Hashim, C McCuskerl, E Nonnandin, M L Benoit-Connors, and B Lahiri
The trajectory of change over multiple outcome areas during comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation
Chronic Respiratory Disease,
January 1, 2006;
3(1):
11 - 18.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Troosters, R. Casaburi, R. Gosselink, and M. Decramer
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
July 1, 2005;
172(1):
19 - 38.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Statement on Home Care for Patients with Respiratory Disorders
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
June 15, 2005;
171(12):
1443 - 1464.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D Dattal and R ZuWallack
High versus low intensity exercise training in pulmonary rehabilitation: is more better?
Chronic Respiratory Disease,
July 1, 2004;
1(3):
143 - 149.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M D L Morgan and J R Britton
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * 8: Non-pharmacological management of COPD
Thorax,
May 1, 2003;
58(5):
453 - 457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R Jones and M D L Morgan
Pulmonary rehabilitation
Thorax,
May 1, 2002;
57(5):
468 - 468.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Subcomm
Pulmonary rehabilitation
Thorax,
November 1, 2001;
56(11):
827 - 834.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.
|