Asthma management in five European countries: doctors' knowledge, attitudes and prescribing behaviour. Drug Education Project (DEP) group

The aim of the study was to examine the relationship between guideline recommendations on asthma management, and the performance of doctors in five different European health care contexts. Knowledge, attitudes and prescribing behaviour of doctors recruited to an educational project was investigated. A total of 698 general practitioners from Germany, The Netherlands, Norway and Sweden, and 94 specialists from the Slovak Republic participated. A questionnaire was used to assess their knowledge and attitudes. Antiasthmatic drugs dispensed to their patients reflected their prescribing behaviour. In response to questions on how to treat chronic asthma, most doctors were in agreement with guideline recommendations. In practice, however, the proportion of asthma patients receiving inhaled steroids varied almost twofold, ranging 31% in Germany to 58% in The Netherlands. On questions related to exacerbation of asthma, German and Slovakian doctors often preferred treatment with antibiotics to steroids. They also more often associated yellow-green sputum with bacterial infection. In conclusion, although many doctors in different health care contexts have accepted the recommendations given in guidelines, the proportion of their patients treated accordingly differed. German and Slovakian doctors seem to attach less importance to the inflammatory features of asthma than the doctors from the other three European countries.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Runge, J. Lecheler, M. Horn, J.-T. Tews, and M. Schaefer Outcomes of a Web-Based Patient Education Program for Asthmatic Children and Adolescents Chest, March 1, 2006; 129(3): 581 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gaga, N. Papageorgiou, E. Zervas, D. Gioulekas, and S. Konstantopoulos Control of Asthma Under Specialist Care: Is It Achieved? Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 78 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Stock, M. Redaelli, M. Luengen, G. Wendland, D. Civello, and K. W. Lauterbach Asthma: prevalence and cost of illness Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2005; 25(1): 47 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Timmermans and A. Mauck The Promises And Pitfalls Of Evidence-Based Medicine Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 18 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Kee, J. Jenkins, S. McIlwaine, C. Patterson, S. Harper, and M. Shields Fast and Frugal Models of Clinical Judgment in Novice and Expert Physicians Med Decis Making, July 1, 2003; 23(4): 293 - 300. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Wahlstrom, E. Hummers-Pradier, C. S. Lundborg, M. Muskova, P. Lagerlov, P. Denig, T. Oke, and D M. C. de Saintonge Variations in asthma treatment in five European countries--judgement analysis of case simulations Fam. Pract., October 1, 2002; 19(5): 452 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. H. Glauber, A. L. Fuhlbrigge, J. A. Finkelstein, C. J. Homer, and S. T. Weiss Relationship Between Asthma Medication and Antibiotic Use Chest, November 1, 2001; 120(5): 1485 - 1492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Williams, M. L. Bouvy, E. R. Heerdink, M. L. De Bruin, R. M. C. Herings, H. G. M. Leufkens, and A. W. Hoes Baseline Rates of Disease May Account for Some Arrhythmia Risk Arch Intern Med, May 14, 2001; 161(9): 1235 - 1236. [Full Text] [PDF]