ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ayres, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, D.
Right arrow Articles by Ayres, J.
Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 137-140
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 2000


Original Articles

Impact of correcting peak flow for nonlinear errors on air pollutant effect estimates from a panel study

DJ Ward, MR Miller, S Walters, RM Harrison, and JG Ayres

Air pollutant effects are commonly investigated using panel studies employing daily measurement of changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF). Variable orifice PEF meters are inaccurate with a nonlinear relationship to actual PEF. The impact on a panel study of correcting these errors was examined. Twice-daily PEF readings were taken by 147 9-yr old children for 8 weeks and corrected using an equation derived from the response of 32 Vitalograph meters to a servomechanism-controlled pump. Pollutant effect estimates for corrected and uncorrected readings were derived using a regression approach incorporating appropriate confounders. Correction impacted little on mean PEF values (333.1-334.2 L x min(-1)), but did alter effect sizes. Nonsignificant nitrogen dioxide estimates for the entire panel decreased by up to 73%, but, for symptomatic/atopic children, a significant 5-day mean result was lost (decrease in effect size from -2.53 to -0.90% per 10 parts per billion (ppb)) and lag 0 became significant (decrease from -0.51 to -1.22% per 10 ppb). Mass concentration estimates of particles with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microm moved in both directions (-0.22 changed to 0.11% per 10 microg x m(-1) lag 3 and -0.29 to -0.73% per 10 microg x m(-3) for the 5-day mean). Correction of nonlinearity of peak expiratory flow meters influenced the overall outcome of this panel study, and the changes in effect estimates would be sufficient to alter the interpretation of some studies. For adults, a greater change in effect estimates may follow the larger correction required for their usual peak expiratory flow range.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
D J Ward, K T Roberts, N Jones, R M Harrison, J G Ayres, S Hussain, and S Walters
Effects of daily variation in outdoor particulates and ambient acid species in normal and asthmatic children
Thorax, June 1, 2002; 57(6): 489 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the European Respiratory Society.