ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richter, K
Right arrow Articles by Magnussen, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richter, K
Right arrow Articles by Magnussen, H
Eur Respir J 1998; 12: 457-462
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Original Articles

Assessment of accuracy and applicability of a new electronic peak flow meter and asthma monitor

K Richter, F Kanniess, B Mark, RA Jorres, and H Magnussen

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy and applicability of a portable electronic peak flow meter combined with an asthma monitor (AM1, Jaeger, Germany) which measures peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC). The technical accuracy in PEF, FEV1 and FVC measurement was tested according to American Thoracic Society (ATS) criteria for monitoring devices using a flow generator. In addition, the effect of connecting a heated screen pneumotachograph (PT) to the AM1 was determined and the accuracy in FEV1 determinations was evaluated by simultaneous measurements in 49 normal volunteers. The devices tested fulfilled all ATS criteria for monitoring devices with respect to the accuracy of PEF, FEV1, and FVC measurements. The conditions of intra- and interdevice variability were satisfied in all cases. Compared with the PT, the AM1 showed about 4% lower values in FEV1, as measured in the 49 subjects. In conclusion, the electronic peak flow meter and asthma monitor AM1 yielded valid measurements of peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in one second, which matched the accuracy criteria of the American Thoracic Society standards for monitoring devices.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. A. Fonseca, A. Costa-Pereira, L. Delgado, L. N. Silva, M. Magalhaes, M. G. Castel-Branco, and M. Vaz
Pulmonary Function Electronic Monitoring Devices: A Randomized Agreement Study
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1258 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
F. Kanniess, K. Richter, S. Janicki, M.B. Schleiss, R.A. Jorres, and H. Magnussen
Dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids under concomitant medication with montelukast in patients with asthma
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2002; 20(5): 1080 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
F. Kanniess, K. Richter, S. Bohme, R.A. Jorres, and H. Magnussen
Montelukast versus fluticasone: effects on lung function, airway responsiveness and inflammation in moderate asthma
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2002; 20(4): 853 - 858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.