ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D
Right arrow Articles by MacNee, W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, D
Right arrow Articles by MacNee, W
Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 1141-1146
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Original Articles

A comparison of three methods of measuring 99mTc-DTPA lung clearance and their repeatability

D Morrison, K Skwarski, AM Millar, W Adams, and W MacNee

The lung clearance of technetium-99m diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) is a measure of respiratory epithelial permeability. Many factors may contribute to the wide range of normal values, including the method of correction for background activity. The aim of this study was to compare three methods of analysis, including their repeatability. 99mTc-DTPA lung clearance imaging was performed on eight nonsmokers (age 32+/-2 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 102.8+/-3.3% predicted yrs, mean+/-SEM and seven smokers (age 46+/-4 yrs, p<0.01, versus nonsmokers; FEV1 88.9+/-8.9%, p<0.05 versus nonsmokers) on two occasions each. The smokers were asked to refrain from smoking for 12 h. An uncorrected analysis was compared with two methods corrected for recirculating background activity using an intravenous correction and inter-renal and shoulder background regions of interest. The uncorrected method gave higher mean values for 50% lung clearance of 99mTc-DTPA (t50) values than the inter-renal (p<0.001) and shoulder (p<0.001) methods of correction in nonsmokers and the inter-renal method gave lower values than the shoulder-corrected method (p<0.05). In smokers there was no difference. There were no differences in mean t50 values obtained on two separate visits. There was no difference in the repeatability of the three methods of analysis. The three methods of analysis produced comparable results with no differences in repeatability.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
H van der Vaart, D S Postma, W Timens, and N H T Ten Hacken
Acute effects of cigarette smoke on inflammation and oxidative stress: a review
Thorax, August 1, 2004; 59(8): 713 - 721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
W. D. Bennett, A. Nemmar, H. Vanbilloen, M. F. Hoylaerts, P. H. M. Hoet, A. Verbruggen, and B. Nemery
Rapid translocation of nanoparticles from the lung to the bloodstream?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2002; 165(12): 1671 - 1672.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. MORRISON, I. RAHMAN, S. LANNAN, and W. MACNEE
Epithelial Permeability, Inflammation, and Oxidant Stress in the Air Spaces of Smokers
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 1999; 159(2): 473 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.