ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollander, A
Right arrow Articles by Brunekreef, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollander, A
Right arrow Articles by Brunekreef, B
Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 929-936
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Original Articles

Work-related changes in peak expiratory flow among laboratory animal workers

A Hollander, D Heederik, and B Brunekreef

Laboratory animal workers are at risk of developing allergic symptoms, of which asthmatic symptoms are the most severe. The aim was to study the relationship between allergic symptoms due to working with rats and variability and changes in peak expiratory flow (PEF). Several indices were used on the basis of the amplitude of the PEF or the differences in PEF between days with and without exposure to rat aeroallergens. Of the 398 rat workers, 73% completed PEF readings on at least 9 days, of whom 208 had PEF readings on working days with and without contact with animals. The overall prevalence rate of allergic symptoms (asthmatic, eye, nose and/or skin) among rat workers during the handling of rats was 17.3%. Asthmatic symptoms were reported by 6.7%. The PEF of the workers who reported asthmatic symptoms due to working with rats decreased significantly on days working with the animals (difference between the minimum PEF averaged over working days with animals and over days without animals (deltaPEFmin-min) = -73 L x min(-1)), compared to the workers without symptoms (2.2 L x min(-1)). This effect was more pronounced among workers with a late asthmatic response, i.e. the presence of asthmatic symptoms several hours after working with rats (deltaPEFmin-min = -11.6 L x min(-1)). Multiple regression analyses showed that only those with asthmatic symptoms several hours after working with rats and those with allergic symptoms had an increased deltaPEFmin-min. In addition, workers with asthmatic symptoms were also more likely to have a higher PEF variability than workers without asthmatic symptoms. However, no difference in PEF variability between days with and without animals contact was observed. This study shows that the peak expiratory flow of workers who reported asthmatic symptoms due to working with rats decreased significantly on days working with laboratory animals.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
V. C. Moore, P. Cullinan, S. Sadhra, and P. S. Burge
Peak expiratory flow analysis in workers exposed to detergent enzymes
Occup. Med., September 1, 2009; 59(6): 418 - 423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup Med (Lond)Home page
R. Sauni, P. Kauppi, E. Helaskoski, P. Virtema, and J. Verbeek
Audit of quality of diagnostic procedures for occupational asthma
Occup. Med., June 1, 2009; 59(4): 230 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
P J Nicholson, P Cullinan, A J Newman Taylor, P S Burge, and C Boyle
Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma
Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2005; 62(5): 290 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. ALMQVIST, M. WICKMAN, L. PERFETTI, N. BERGLIND, A. RENSTROM, M. HEDREN, K. LARSSON, G. HEDLIN, and P. MALMBERG
Worsening of Asthma in Children Allergic to Cats, after Indirect Exposure to Cat at School
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2001; 163(3): 694 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.