ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Folgering, H
Right arrow Articles by v Herwaarden, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Folgering, H
Right arrow Articles by v Herwaarden, C
Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 188-193
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1998


Original Articles

Eleven peak flow meters: a clinical evaluation

H Folgering, W vd Brink, O v Heeswijk, and C v Herwaarden

Peak flow meters are essential tools in the management of asthma. Many types are on the market. A computer-driven piston pump is normally not available for evaluation of the various meters. Comparison with values from a pneumotachograph is an accepted way of testing peak flow meters. This study aims at comparing 11 peak flow meters, for accuracy and linearity. Seven adult peak flow meters were tested: Miniwright with an equidistant scale (Clement Clarke); Personal Best (Healthscan); Wright Pocket fdE (Ferraris); Vitalograph (Vitalograph); Assess (Healthscan); Pocket Peak flow meter (Micro Medical); and Truzone (Monaghan). Furthermore, four low-range (LR) peak flow meters were tested: LR Miniwright with equidistant scale (Clement Clarke); LR Personal Best (Healthscan); LR Wright Pocket (LR Ferraris); and LR Pocket peak flow meter (LR Micro Medical). Two test series were performed: in the first one, a peak flow meter was connected downstream in series with a Fleisch #4 pneumotachograph. One subject performed 50 partial forced expiratory manoeuvres through this ensemble. In the second series, 50 adult patients and 25 healthy children performed sequential maximal forced expiratory manoeuvres on each peak flow meter, and on the pneumotachograph. A ranking system was devised for the various parameters of agreement of the meters with the pneumotachograph. Substantial differences in the quality of the adult meters were found. The adult peak flow meters with the closest agreement to the pneumotachograph were Personal Best and Micro Medical. In the low-range peak flow meters, the lowest differences were seen in the LR Personal Best and LR Micro Medical.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
J. A. Fonseca, A. Costa-Pereira, L. Delgado, L. N. Silva, M. Magalhaes, M. G. Castel-Branco, and M. Vaz
Pulmonary Function Electronic Monitoring Devices: A Randomized Agreement Study
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1258 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
E Dompeling, A M Oudesluys-Murphy, H M Janssens, W Hop, J G Brinkman, R N Sukhai, and J C de Jongste
Randomised controlled study of clinical efficacy of spacer therapy in asthma with regard to electrostatic charge
Arch. Dis. Child., February 1, 2001; 84(2): 178 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the European Respiratory Society.