ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Mark, T.
Right arrow Articles by Koeter, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Mark, T.
Right arrow Articles by Koeter, G.
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 2120-2123
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Water vapour and carbon dioxide decrease nitric oxide readings

TW van der Mark, E Kort, RJ Meijer, DS Postma, and GH Koeter

Measurement of nitric oxide levels in exhaled air is commonly performed using a chemiluminescence detector. However, water vapour and carbon dioxide affect the chemiluminescence process. The influence of these gases at the concentrations present in exhaled air, has not yet been studied. For this in vitro study, mixtures of 50, 100 and 200 parts per billion (ppb) NO in air were prepared and fed into the NO analyser either directly or bubbled through water. Mixtures with CO2 were prepared by adding 0-10% CO2 to the diluent air. We found a significant decrease in NO readings in the water-saturated samples compared to the dry gas (p < 0.001), strongly dependent on the partial pressure of water. NO levels in exhaled air (mean 10 +/- 2 ppb) showed a decrease of 17 +/- 3% when water vapour was not absorbed. From the experiments with CO2 we found a decrease in NO reading of 1.04 +/- 0.07% per volume CO2 (%). Presence of water vapour, thus, leads to a systematic underestimation of NO levels. Insertion of a water absorber might, therefore, be advantageous. The influence of CO2 concentrations in the normal respiratory range is negligible. With high expiratory CO2 levels as applied in permissive hypercapnia, the effects may be substantial.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
ATS/ERS Recommendations for Standardized Procedures for the Online and Offline Measurement of Exhaled Lower Respiratory Nitric Oxide and Nasal Nitric Oxide, 2005
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2005; 171(8): 912 - 930.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
G L Piacentini, A Bodini, D G Peroni, M M. Del Giudice Jr, S Costella, and A L Boner
Reduction in exhaled nitric oxide immediately after methacholine challenge in asthmatic children
Thorax, September 1, 2002; 57(9): 771 - 773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. C. de JONGSTE and K. ALVING
Gas Analysis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2000; 162(2): S23 - 27.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. Silkoff
Recommendations for Standardized Procedures for the Online and Offline Measurement of Exhaled Lower Respiratory Nitric Oxide and Nasal Nitric Oxide in Adults and Children---1999 . THIS OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY WAS ADOPTED BY THE ATS BOARD OF DIRECTORS, JULY 1999
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 1999; 160(6): 2104 - 2117.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. Murtz, L. Menzel, W. Bloch, A. Hess, O. Michel, and W. Urban
LMR spectroscopy: a new sensitive method for on-line recording of nitric oxide in breath
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 1999; 86(3): 1075 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.