ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, A
Right arrow Articles by Mauch, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roth, A
Right arrow Articles by Mauch, H
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 1877-1891
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Molecular diagnosis of tuberculosis: current clinical validity and future perspectives

A Roth, T Schaberg, and H Mauch

The rapid development and availability of a variety of new molecular genetic technologies present the clinician with an array of options for the accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases. This is particularly the case for tuberculosis, since molecular methods have been rapidly introduced into all working areas of the mycobacteriology laboratory. Nucleic acid amplification methods to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical specimens are increasingly used as a tool to diagnose tuberculosis. The bulk of recently available data from clinical evaluations performed under routine laboratory conditions indicate that these molecular methods are rapid and sensitive, but yet inferior, to culture with regard to sensitivity and specificity. Therefore, until gene amplification tests have proved to be reliable and quality control procedures exist, their clinical validity remains controversial. Consequently, definition of selected clinical applications of gene amplification to routine diagnosis of tuberculosis is important and need to be discussed. This review will focus on the clinical role of molecular methods in the direct detection and diagnosis of M. tuberculosis in clinical samples. In addition, molecular genetic approaches designed to determine drug susceptibility and to discriminate strains below the species level will be outlined and discussed in terms of their current and future clinical applicability.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
M. D. Perkins, M. B. Conde, M. Martins, and A. L. Kritski
Serologic Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Using a Simple Commercial Multiantigen Assay
Chest, January 1, 2003; 123(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R. Loddenkemper, D. Sagebiel, and A. Brendel
Strategies against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2002; 20(36_suppl): 66S - 77s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Ruiz-Manzano, J.-M. Manterola, F. Gamboa, A. Calatrava, E. Monso, C. Martinez, and V. Ausina
Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Paraffin-Embedded Pleural Biopsy Specimens by Commercial Ribosomal RNA and DNA Amplification Kits
Chest, September 1, 2000; 118(3): 648 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. Gallina, P. Troupioti, G. Rocco, G. Sensalari, and E. Libanori
Predicting Culture Results for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Complex : Amplified Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Direct Test and Acid-Fast Bacilli Microscopy
Chest, July 1, 2000; 118(1): 28 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
A. García-Quintanilla, L. Garcia, G. Tudó, M. Navarro, J. González, and M. T. Jiménez de Anta
Single-Tube Balanced Heminested PCR for Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Smear-Negative Samples
J. Clin. Microbiol., March 1, 2000; 38(3): 1166 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Med MicrobiolHome page
F.A. DROBNIEWSKI, S.A. WATTERSON, S.M. WILSON, and G.S. HARRIS
A clinical, microbiological and economic analysis of a national service for the rapid molecular diagnosis of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Med. Microbiol., March 1, 2000; 49(3): 271 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
H. Sidhu, R. P. Holmes, M. J. Allison, and A. B. Peck
Direct Quantification of the Enteric Bacterium Oxalobacter formigenes in Human Fecal Samples by Quantitative Competitive-Template PCR
J. Clin. Microbiol., May 1, 1999; 37(5): 1503 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. JOUVESHOMME, E. CAMBAU, D. TRYSTRAM, M. SZPYTMA, W. SOUGAKOFF, J.-P. DERENNE, and J. GROSSET
Clinical Utility of an Amplification Test Based on Ligase Chain Reaction in Pulmonary Tuberculosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 1998; 158(4): 1096 - 1101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S. A. Watterson, S. M. Wilson, M. D. Yates, and F. A. Drobniewski
Comparison of Three Molecular Assays for Rapid Detection of Rifampin Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis
J. Clin. Microbiol., July 1, 1998; 36(7): 1969 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.