ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipworth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipworth, B.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, D.
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 1820-1823
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Clinical Trial

Lung delivery of salbutamol by dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) and small volume antistatic metal spacer (Airomir CFC-free MDI plus NebuChamber)

BJ Lipworth and DJ Clark

As a worldwide ban on the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) in inhaler devices approaches, considerable attention has been focused on the production of CFC-free delivery devices. The aim of our study was to compare the delivery of salbutamol by dry powder inhaler (DPI), Turbuhaler and a CFC-free metered-dose inhaler (MDI), Airomir, used with a novel small volume metal spacer (NebuChamber). Ten healthy volunteers, mean (SEM) age 21 (0.7) yrs were studied in a randomized, single (investigator)-blind cross-over design. Single doses of 1,200 microg salbutamol, from Turbuhaler DPI and Airomir CFC-free MDI via a NebuChamber, were given as 12 sequential 100 microg inhalations over 6 min. The lung delivery of salbutamol was assessed by measuring the plasma salbutamol profile over the first 20 min after inhalation. Plasma salbutamol concentration was expressed as maximal (Cmax) and average (Cav) value. Significant differences (p<0.001) were found between the NebuChamber (N) and the Turbuhaler (T) for salbutamol Cmax and Cav. This amounted to a 1.89 fold difference (95% CI 1.56-2.22) between these devices for Cmax, and a 1.78 fold difference (95% CI 1.42-2.15) for Cav. We have demonstrated that, in vivo, salbutamol from a chlorofluorocarbon-free metered-dose inhaler given via a small volume metal spacer (NebuChamber) produces significantly greater delivery than from an efficient dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S. J FOWLER and B. J LIPWORTH
Therapeutic equivalence of inhaled salbutamol
Thorax, April 1, 2000; 55(4): 345e - 345.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.