ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, R
Right arrow Articles by Morell, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vidal, R
Right arrow Articles by Morell, F
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 1327-1331
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Increased risk of tuberculosis transmission in families with microepidemics

R Vidal, M Miravitlles, JA Cayla, M Torrella, J de Gracia, and F Morell

In the present study, we analysed: 1) prevalence of TB infection and incidence of disease among family contacts of a cohort of patients with TB; 2) differential characteristics of families with microepidemics and families with < or = 1 new case of TB; and 3) efficacy of chemoprophylaxis in this group of contacts. Three thousand and seventy one family contacts of 635 patients with TB were studied. The study consisted of tuberculin skin testing and chest radiography in all cases, and bacteriological studies when active disease was suspected. Contacts were classified as belonging to: families with microepidemics (FME) (those with > or = 2 new cases of TB); families with one new case; and families with with no new cases. Chemoprophylaxis was prescribed in contacts following standard recommendations; all were followed up for 12-18 months. Rates of TB infection and disease among families, as well as the incidence of TB disease between those compliant and noncompliant with chemoprophylaxis were compared. Among the 3,071 contacts, 1,264 (41%) were infected and 176 (6%) had TB. Twenty two families with FME (3%) yielded 55 new cases of TB. The prevalence of infection (excluding the TB cases) was 80% in families with FME, 52% in families with one new case, and 41% in families with no new case (odds ratio (OR) 3.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.1-6.5). Sputum smears were positive in 53% of cases in FME and 24% in non-FME families (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.7-6.5). Bronchial sample cultures were positive in 84% of patients from FME families but in only 40% of those from non-FME families (OR 7.5; 95% CI 3.6-15.8). Chemoprophylaxis was prescribed in 356 contacts, of whom 296 complied and generated only one new case of TB, whilst there were 13 new cases among the 60 who did not comply (OR 81.6; 95% CI 26.7-248.7). This study showed the prevalence of infection and incidence of tuberculosis among family contacts of patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis to be very high. A small number of families with microepidemics accounted for most new cases of tuberculosis, which were also more infectious. The extremely high risk of transmission in these families, together with the proven efficacy of chemoprophylaxis, justifies prescription of chemoprophylaxis to all their members, regardless of age.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Trop Med HygHome page
S. Akhtar and S. K. Rathi
Multilevel Modeling of Household Contextual Determinants of Tuberculin Skin Test Positivity among Contacts of Infectious Tuberculosis Patients, Umerkot, Pakistan
Am J Trop Med Hyg, March 1, 2009; 80(3): 351 - 358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.