ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bracher, A
Right arrow Articles by Oliven, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bracher, A
Right arrow Articles by Oliven, A
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 990-993
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Histochemical properties of upper airway muscles: comparison of dilator and nondilator muscles

A Bracher, R Coleman, R Schnall, and A Oliven

The upper airway dilator muscles (UADMs) represent a subgroup of muscles in the pharyngeal area which, in addition to their roles in mastication, vocalization, etc., also have an important respiratory function. Failure of these muscles to maintain upper airway patency during sleep is important in the development of the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. In the present study, we evaluated the histochemical properties of the UADMs and compared them to those of neighbouring muscles without respiratory functions, and to the diaphragm, to determine whether the UADMs are specifically adapted to their respiratory role. Our results, both in dogs and rats, indicate that the dilator and nondilator upper airway muscles are similar and differ from the diaphragm. In rats, there were significantly less type I fibres (<12% as compared to 42% for the diaphragm) and more type IIb fibres (39-67% as compared to 27% for the diaphragm). A similar pattern was seen in dogs: type I fibres <38% as compared to 46% for the diaphragm, and type IIb fibres, 29-35% as compared to 10% for the diaphragm. These findings suggest that the upper airway dilator muscles are not specifically designed for their respiratory role. They may fail in the presence of increased loads, often encountered in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, unless appropriate adaptive structural changes take place.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Simpson and S. Iscoe
Cardiorespiratory failure in rat induced by severe inspiratory resistive loading
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2007; 102(4): 1556 - 1564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. McGuire, M. MacDermott, and A. Bradford
The Effects of Chronic Episodic Hypercapnic Hypoxia on Rat Upper Airway Muscle Contractile Properties and Fiber-Type Distribution
Chest, October 1, 2002; 122(4): 1400 - 1406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. McGuire, M. MacDermott, and A. Bradford
Effects of Chronic Episodic Hypoxia on Rat Upper Airway Muscle Contractile Properties and Fiber-Type Distribution*
Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 1012 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.