ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Navajas, D
Right arrow Articles by Rotger, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Navajas, D
Right arrow Articles by Rotger, M
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 901-904
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Gas compression artefacts when testing peak expiratory flow meters with mechanically-driven syringes

D Navajas, J Roca, R Farre, and M Rotger

Mechanically-driven syringes used to test peak expiratory flow (PEF) meters must produce the American Thoracic Society (ATS) standard waveforms with PEF accuracy of 2%. However, gas compression within the syringe could result in significant PEF inaccuracy when testing high resistance meters. The gas compression artefact was investigated in a mechanical syringe (PWG; MH Custom Design & Mfg L.C., Midvale, Ut, USA) of 13.6 L connected to a standard range mini-Wright PEF meter (Clement Clarke International, Harlow, UK). Scaled versions of the ATS standard waveform No. 24, with peak flows of 750 and 450 L x min(-1), were discharged through the PEF meter from different starting piston positions to vary syringe volume (Vsyr). The PEF recorded by the meter decreased linearly with increasing Vsyr. PEF decreased by 0.31 and 0.27% per litre for the ATS standard waveforms with PEF of 750 and 450 L x min(-1), respectively. The target PEF computed from piston displacement overread the actual PEF delivered into the PEF meter by approximately 4% when Vsyr = 13.6 L. Overreading fell to approximately 1% when Vsyr was reduced to 3.62 L. Therefore, gas compression error in commercially available large mechanical syringes can exceed the 2% inaccuracy limit when testing high resistance portable PEF meters. Measurements can be corrected for gas compression by linearly extrapolating PEF recordings to zero volume.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
R. L. Jensen, J. G. Teeter, R. D. England, H. J. White, E. H. Pickering, and R. O. Crapo
Instrument Accuracy and Reproducibility in Measurements of Pulmonary Function
Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 388 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. R. MILLER, B. JONES, Y. XU, O. F. PEDERSEN, and P. H. QUANJER
Peak Expiratory Flow Profiles Delivered by Pump Systems . Limitations due to Wave Action
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2000; 161(6): 1887 - 1896.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.