ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Musch, G
Right arrow Articles by Pesenti, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Musch, G
Right arrow Articles by Pesenti, A
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 2545-2552
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Lung and chest wall mechanics in normal anaesthetized subjects and in patients with COPD at different PEEP levels

G Musch, G Foti, M Cereda, P Pelosi, D Poppi, and A Pesenti

In order to assess the relative contribution of the lung and the chest wall to the derangements of respiratory mechanics in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with acute ventilatory failure (AVF), we studied eight COPD patients undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation for AVF and nine normal subjects anaesthetized for surgery as a control group. With the use of the interrupter technique together with the oesophageal balloon technique we measured: static lung and chest wall elastances (E[st,L] and E[st,w], respectively), maximum (R[L,max]), minimum (R[L,min]) and additional (deltaR[L]) lung resistances, additional chest wall resistance (deltaRw) and, in the COPD group, total intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPtot). Measurements were repeated at 0, 5, 10 and 15 cmH2O of applied positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). We found that, in the COPD group: 1) both E(st,w) and deltaRw were higher than in the normal group; 2) R(L,max) was markedly increased due to an increase of both R(L,min) and deltaRL; 3) even low levels of PEEP increased PEEPtot; 4) PEEP did not reduce elastance or total resistance of either the lung or the chest wall. We conclude that chest wall mechanics are abnormal in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with acute ventilatory failure undergoing controlled mechanical ventilation and that positive end-expiratory pressure does not seem to be effective in reducing either elastance or resistance of the lung or chest wall.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. Guerin, G. Fournier, and J. Milic-Emili
Effects of PEEP on inspiratory resistance in mechanically ventilated COPD patients
Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2001; 18(3): 491 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.