ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, W.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, W.
Right arrow Articles by Weiss, S.
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 2515-2521
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Annual variability in methacholine responsiveness in nonasthmatic working adults

WS Beckett, PA Pace, SJ Sferlazza, VJ Carey, and ST Weiss

Change in airway responsiveness is used frequently as a clinical as well as an epidemiological tool. Changes in airway responsiveness can be superior to other measures of lung function in that they are more sensitive indicators of an environmental effect. However, normal variation in test results must be defined before change can be interpreted. To characterize annual variability in airways responsiveness, we administered a high-dose methacholine challenge at 1 yr intervals for up to 4 yrs to 105 healthy, nonasthmatic working subjects. Using this high-dose protocol, the majority of tests (83%) produced at least a 20 % fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), allowing standard calculation of the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20). An annual change in methacholine responsiveness by one or more doubling doses was seen in at least 30% of subjects each year. The components of variance of airways responsiveness measures were estimated to allow direct comparison of within-subject and between-subject variability. The within-subject variability in PD20, was markedly greater than the comparable within-subject variability in FEV1. Level of FEV1 and age were both significant determinants of methacholine responsiveness. Comparison of two methods of expressing methacholine responsiveness (PD20 using the full challenge up to 250 mg x mL(-1) methacholine, and the dose-response slope using data up to 32 mg x mL(-1) methacholine as the maximum dose) had similar annual variability in censored data and mixed-effects models. We then developed an approach to statistical analysis of "right-censored" methacholine challenge data using a maximum likelihood estimation under a censored Gaussian model. These studies of methacholine responsiveness provide normative data on annual test variability in healthy, nonasthmatic working adults, and show that a shorter low-dose challenge has comparable annual variability to a lengthier high-dose challenge.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. Chinn, D. Jarvis, C. M. Luczynska, U. Ackermann-Liebrich, J. M. Anto, I. Cerveri, R. de Marco, T. Gislason, J. Heinrich, C. Janson, et al.
An Increase in Bronchial Responsiveness Is Associated with Continuing or Restarting Smoking
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2005; 172(8): 956 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S Chinn and J P Schouten
Reproducibility of non-specific bronchial challenge in adults: implications for design, analysis and interpretation of clinical and epidemiological studies
Thorax, May 1, 2005; 60(5): 395 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.