ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barry, P.
Right arrow Articles by O'Callaghan, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barry, P.
Right arrow Articles by O'Callaghan, C
Eur Respir J 1997; 10: 35-37
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1997


Original Articles

Nasal mucociliary transport is impaired at altitude

PW Barry, NP Mason, and C O'Callaghan

There have been a number of anecdotal reports of rhinitis and nasal obstruction occurring at altitude. To quantify these reports, we investigated nasal obstruction and mucociliary transport in a group of healthy volunteers trekking to Mount Everest Base Camp, Nepal, altitude 5,300 m. Nasal obstruction was estimated by subjective scoring and mucociliary transport was determined by the saccharin method. Subjective assessment showed that nasal obstruction was increased on arrival at 5,300 m in 23 out of 54 subjects, unchanged in 24, and decreased in seven (McNemar's test: chi 2 = 7.5; p < 0.01). The median saccharin time at sea level was 11 min (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 8-17 min) and increased to 60 min (95% CI 27-60 min) on arrival at 5,300 m. Compared to sea level, the saccharin time was prolonged in 25 out of 33 subjects (McNemar's test: chi 2 = 14.7; p < 0.01), and remained prolonged after 2 weeks at altitude (median 60 min; 95% CI 38-60 min). These results confirm the subjective feelings of nasal obstruction and show that nasal mucociliary transport times are increased at altitude. The mechanisms of these findings are not clear, but nasal obstruction may impede breathing and adversely affect performance at altitude.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. A. Choudhuri, L. G. Ogden, A. J. Ruttenber, D. S.K. Thomas, J. K. Todd, and E. A.F. Simoes
Effect of Altitude on Hospitalizations for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection
Pediatrics, February 1, 2006; 117(2): 349 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
P.W. Barry, N.P. Mason, and J-P. Richalet
Nasal peak inspiratory flow at altitude
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2002; 19(1): 16 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
D G W Buckler and F O'Higgins
Medical provision and usage for the 1999 Everest marathon
Br. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2000; 34(3): 205 - 209.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the European Respiratory Society.