|
|
||||||||
Clinical Trial |
This study tested the effect of two methods of training, one individualized at the heart rate corresponding to the gas exchange threshold (GET) and the other at the heart rate corresponding to 50% of maximal heart rate reserve, on maximal and submaximal cardiorespiratory response in 24 patients with chronic airway limitation (CAL). The patients were randomly assigned to either the individualized training group (IT; n = 12) or the standardized training group (ST; n = 12). The training programme consisted of 4 weeks of stationary bicycle exercise, 5 days.week-1. Before reconditioning began, the target level based on heart rate was not significantly different between groups (109 +/- 4 versus 110 +/- 3 beats.min-1, in IT and ST, respectively). Post-training, a significant increase in symptom-limited oxygen uptake (V'O2.sl) and maximal O2 pulse was found in IT, whereas ST exhibited no significant change. In each group, GET was statistically increased in much the same way as V'O2,sl, with a higher increase in IT (p < 0.01) than ST (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, IT exhibited a concomitant and gradual decrease in minute ventilation (V'E), carbon dioxide production (V'CO2), and venous lactate concentration ([La]), whereas ST presented no significant change in these parameters (intergroup p < 0.01). Breathing pattern was also altered after IT, at the same metabolic level and at the same ventilation level (intergroup p < 0.05). Cardiac responses were modified in the two groups. At the same metabolic level, a significantly lower cardiac frequency was found both for IT and ST (intragroup p < 0.05 after training). In contrast, the increase in O2 pulse was only significantly higher in It after training. These data show the greater efficiency of an individualized training protocol based on determination of gas exchange threshold as compared to a standardized protocol, in improving exercise performance, when applied to a patient group. Despite an apparently similar target training level, the individualized method clearly optimized the physiological training effects in patients with chronic airway limitation and, more particularly, decreased their ventilatory requirement.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. G. Collins, W. E. Langbein, L. Fehr, S. O'Connell, C. Jelinek, E. Hagarty, L. Edwards, D. Reda, M. J. Tobin, and F. Laghi Can Ventilation-Feedback Training Augment Exercise Tolerance in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 15, 2008; 177(8): 844 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Ries, G. S. Bauldoff, B. W. Carlin, R. Casaburi, C. F. Emery, D. A. Mahler, B. Make, C. L. Rochester, R. ZuWallack, and C. Herrerias Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5_suppl): 4S - 42S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Nici, C. Donner, E. Wouters, R. Zuwallack, N. Ambrosino, J. Bourbeau, M. Carone, B. Celli, M. Engelen, B. Fahy, et al. American thoracic society/european respiratory society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2006; 173(12): 1390 - 1413. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Hill Pulmonary rehabilitation. Proceedings of the ATS, January 1, 2006; 3(1): 66 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Couillard and C. Prefaut From muscle disuse to myopathy in COPD: potential contribution of oxidative stress Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2005; 26(4): 703 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Troosters, R. Casaburi, R. Gosselink, and M. Decramer Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 2005; 172(1): 19 - 38. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M A Puhan, H J Schunemann, M Frey, M Scharplatz, and L M Bachmann How should COPD patients exercise during respiratory rehabilitation? Comparison of exercise modalities and intensities to treat skeletal muscle dysfunction Thorax, May 1, 2005; 60(5): 367 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Ambrosino and S. Strambi New strategies to improve exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2004; 24(2): 313 - 322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gilbert Clinical Applications of Breathing Regulation: Beyond Anxiety Management Behav Modif, October 1, 2003; 27(5): 692 - 709. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M D L Morgan and J R Britton Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * 8: Non-pharmacological management of COPD Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(5): 453 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K P S. Nair Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation Clinical Rehabilitation, February 1, 2003; 17(2): 192 - 202. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ortega, J. Toral, P. Cejudo, R. Villagomez, H. Sanchez, J. Castillo, and T. Montemayor Comparison of Effects of Strength and Endurance Training in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2002; 166(5): 669 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Normandin, C. McCusker, M. Connors, F. Vale, D. Gerardi, and R. L. ZuWallack An Evaluation of Two Approaches to Exercise Conditioning in Pulmonary Rehabilitation* Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1085 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Subcomm Pulmonary rehabilitation Thorax, November 1, 2001; 56(11): 827 - 834. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Casaburi Skeletal Muscle Function in COPD Chest, May 1, 2000; 117(5_suppl_1): 267S - 271S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Vogiatzis, A. F. Williamson, J. Miles, and I. K. Taylor Physiological Response to Moderate Exercise Workloads in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Varying Degrees of Airflow Obstruction Chest, November 1, 1999; 116(5): 1200 - 1207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Pulmonary Rehabilitation---1999 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 1, 1999; 159(5): 1666 - 1682. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease . A Statement of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 1999; 159(4): S2 - 40. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |