ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broseghini, C
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Broseghini, C
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, A
Eur Respir J 1988; 1: 726-731
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1988


Original Articles

Respiratory resistance and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)

C Broseghini, R Brandolese, R Poggi, M Bernasconi, E Manzin, and A Rossi

Fourteen consecutive ARDS patients were examined within 24 h from the onset of mechanical ventilation to determine respiratory resistance (Rrs) and compliance (Cstrs), and to assess the influence of "intrinsic" positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) on the measurement of Cstrs. Flow, pressure, and changes in lung volume were measured with the transducers of the Servo 900C Siemens ventilator. Airway occlusion was performed with the end-inspiratory and end-expiratory buttons of the ventilator. We found PEEPi (3.0 +/- 2.6 cm H2O) in ten of the fourteen patients. Without the correction for PEEPi, Cstrs was underestimated by 13.9 +/- 10% on average in the group as a whole (fourteen patients), and by 19.5 +/- 5.9% in the ten ARDS patients with PEEPi. Maximum and minimum respiratory resistance (Rrsmax and Rrsmin), and frequency-dependence of Rrs were also measured. On average, there was a marked frequency-dependence of resistance, as manifested by the difference between Rrsmax and Rrsmin, with an increase of both Rrsmin (7.7 +/- 4.2 cm H2O.l-1.s) and Rrsmax (14.3 +/- 5.0 cm H2O.l-1.s). The added resistance of the endotracheal tubes and ventilator tubings was flow dependent, and averaged 13.2 +/- 2.9 cm H2O.l-1.s.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
B. Babik, F. Petak, T. Asztalos, Z.I. Deak, G. Bogats, and Z. Hantos
Components of respiratory resistance monitored in mechanically ventilated patients
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2002; 20(6): 1538 - 1544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
ATS/ERS Statement on Respiratory Muscle Testing
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2002; 166(4): 518 - 624.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. P. KRESS, M. F. O'CONNOR, and G. A. SCHMIDT
Clinical Examination Reliably Detects Intrinsic Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Critically Ill, Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 1999; 159(1): 290 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the European Respiratory Society.