ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rotger, M
Right arrow Articles by Duvivier, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rotger, M
Right arrow Articles by Duvivier, C
Eur Respir J 1988; 1: 439-444
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1988


Original Articles

Density dependence of respiratory input impedance re-evaluated with a head generator minimizing upper airway shunt

M Rotger, R Peslin, D Navajas, C Gallina, and C Duvivier

Total respiratory impedance was assessed from 4 to 30 Hz in ten normal subjects breathing air and a helium-oxygen gas mixture using two methods of applying pressure oscillations at the airway opening: 1) the conventional method where pressure is varied at the mouth: 2) the method recently developed by Peslin et al. (J Appl Physiol, 1985, 59, 1790-1795) in which pressure is varied both at the mouth and around the head to minimize transmural pressure across upper airway walls, and the corresponding artefact. When breathing air slightly lower resistances (p less than 0.05) and considerably higher inertances (p less than 0.001) were found using the head generator. Breathing helium-oxygen reduced respiratory resistance and its frequency dependence, as well as respiratory inertance very significantly (p less than 0.001), with minor differences between the changes seen with the two methods. In contrast, the changes in respiratory compliance were small, and not in the same direction, when pressure was varied at the mouth and around the head. It is concluded that the accuracy of the conventional method may be sufficient for diagnostic purposes in subjects without gross mechanical abnormalities, i.e. for early detection of mechanical abnormalities.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the European Respiratory Society.